Non-Est Filings and Limitation under Section 34: Delhi High Court’s Pragati Constructions Ruling
The article critically examines the Delhi High Court’s recent full bench ruling in Pragati Constructions Consultants v. Union of India (2025), which addressed the consequences of procedural defects in Section 34 petitions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sep 14
Â
The Tale of Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrators under Indian Law — Can their Mandate be Resurrected?
Priyanshu Shrivastava[1] Background Giving one party the right to appoint an arbitrator of their choice, directly or indirectly, goes...
Jun 3, 2023
Â
Antrix-Devas Dispute: A Tale of Proving Corruption Allegations in International Arbitration
*Arnav Doshi Introduction The growing tendency of corruption employed as a ground for non-enforcement of arbitral awards has awoken...
Jul 8, 2022
Â
Exercising Discretion in Stay of Enforcement of a Domestic Arbitration award
An article discussing the conflict between CPC and Arbitration Act relating to stay of enforcement of a domestic arbitration award.
Mar 16, 2022
Â
UNILATERAL APPOINTMENT & REFUSAL TO SET ASIDE THE AWARD: THE PERILS OF THE DELHI HC JUDGMENT
-Rohan Gulati* Introduction & Factual Background Recently, in Kanodia Infrastructure Ltd. v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd.[1], the Hon’ble...
Dec 10, 2021
Â
COURT’S POWER UNDER SECTION 34: THE EXTENT AND SCOPE OF THE APPLICATION THROUGH NHAI V. M. HAKEEM
Swetalana Rout In a significant ruling of the Supreme Court[1], it has been decided that the scope of power of a Court is limited to the...
Sep 13, 2021
Â