THE ARBITRATION WORKSHOP

The apex Court in its recent ruling in the case of Hindustan Construction Company Ltd v. Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited, noted, and importantly so, that “arbitration is often a friend in conferences, but a foe in practice”; this question is the very core of the condition of arbitration of disputes in the country.

The article critically examines the Delhi High Court’s recent full bench ruling in Pragati Constructions Consultants v. Union of India (2025), which addressed the consequences of procedural defects in Section 34 petitions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Priyanshu Shrivastava[1] Background Giving one party the right to appoint an arbitrator of their choice, directly or indirectly, goes...

*Arnav Doshi Introduction The growing tendency of corruption employed as a ground for non-enforcement of arbitral awards has awoken...

An article discussing the conflict between CPC and Arbitration Act relating to stay of enforcement of a domestic arbitration award.

-Rohan Gulati* Introduction & Factual Background Recently, in Kanodia Infrastructure Ltd. v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd.[1], the Hon’ble...