

WhatsApp Agreements: Reimagining Arbitration in the Global Age
The recent Delhi High Court judgment in Belvedere Resources DMCC v. OCL Iron & Steel Ltd 2025 SCC OnLine Del 4652 held Whatsapp messages and email constituted a valid arbitration agreement under Section 7(4)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
3 days ago


The Expert's Gambit: Reframing 'Issue Conflict' in Modern Arbitration
an ‘issue conflict’ in arbitration describes the existence of actual or apparent bias on the part of the arbitrator stemming from his or her previously expressed views on a question that goes to the very outcome of the case to be decided. It denotes the arbitrator’s relationship to the subject matter of the dispute, and his or her perceived capacity to adjudicate with an open mind
Feb 7


Minimal Interference, Maximum Efficacy: Enforcement of Foreign Commercial Arbitral Awards in India Post-2015
This article examines India’s evolving pro-enforcement stance towards foreign commercial arbitral awards following the 2015 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. It highlights how courts now restrict interference to narrow grounds under Section 48 (fraud, corruption, or violation of fundamental policy/morality) while penalizing dilatory tactics. Analysis of Landmark Cases such as Renusagar, Shri Lal Mahal, Vijay Karia, and Avitel provided.
Sep 28, 2025


Non-Est Filings and Limitation under Section 34: Delhi High Court’s Pragati Constructions Ruling
The article critically examines the Delhi High Court’s recent full bench ruling in Pragati Constructions Consultants v. Union of India (2025), which addressed the consequences of procedural defects in Section 34 petitions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sep 14, 2025


Real Estate Arbitration in India: Practice, Pitfalls, and the Path Forward
The blog examines the increasing use of arbitration to resolve various types of real estate disputes in India, including those between countries, construction-related matters, and tech-related disputes.
Sep 6, 2025


Pragmatism over Pedantry: In Defence of the Power to Modify Arbitral Awards Post-Gayatri Balaswamy
This article presents a detailed legal analysis in support of the Supreme Court's landmark majority opinion in Gayatri Balaswamy v. M/S ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd. It argues that granting courts a limited power to modify arbitral awards is a pragmatic and necessary evolution, not judicial overreach, and counters textualist critiques by defending the Court’s purposive interpretation, which frames modification as a logical corollary of severability.
Aug 30, 2025



