-Rohan Gulati* Introduction & Factual Background Recently, in Kanodia Infrastructure Ltd. v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd.[1], the Hon’ble...

Arnav Doshi[1] INTRODUCTION The arrival of the significant ruling in Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail...

Abhijeet Kumar[1] Introduction 1. In works contract, delays and prolongation are inevitable which are entered into for long projects....

Harshvardhan Tripathi [1] Introduction The readers of arbitration law would be well aware that consent is considered the “cornerstone” of...

Harshit Batra discusses consent in binding of non-signatories to arbitration.

-Aditya Rathore and Amit Chawla[1] 1. Introduction Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is a legal provision in International...

Swetalana Rout In a significant ruling of the Supreme Court[1], it has been decided that the scope of power of a Court is limited to the...

*Snehil Balani Understanding the Problem There is a constant wiggle between international arbitration proceedings and cross-border...

How do we resolve the seat v. forum selection clause debate.?

If the court is of the view that the arbitration proceedings cannot be carried out, then it has the power to change the seat of arbitration

This paper discusses the creation of a Permanent Court of Investment Arbitration (“PCIA”).

Umang Bhat Nair[1] Arbitration today, as a means of consensual dispute resolution, can be likened to a game of football where the...

Gaurav Rai and Suraj Raj Kesherwani dive deep into the world shareholder disputes and the need for emergency arbitration in India.

In this article, Arpit Sarangi discusses the law of limitation as it is applicable to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Harshvardhan Tripathi of NALSAR , Hyderabad takes us through the development of jurisprudence of the venue/seat debate.

-Rohan Gulati* INTRODUCTION While unraveling the curtains of party autonomy in arbitration, the aspect of two Indian parties selecting a...

Primer on the important legislations related to the environment and how it could be practical to adopt arbitration to resolve such disputes.

This article discusses the possibility of resolving climate change disputes by arbitration and mediation.

- Rituparna Padhy This is Part I of a three-part series on the new proviso regarding unconditional stay of an award upon discovery of...

Milind Yadav[1] The 2019 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) has helped propel India forward as...

a view taken by the tribunal should not be interfered with, the distinction is drawn between an alternative view and an impossible view

- Gautam Mohanty[1] PDF version of the article 1. In this article, the author discusses the judgment of the Balasore Alloys Limited v....

Term can only be implied if it is necessary to give business efficacy and if words in a contract flout business common sense it must yield.

Equating a financial crunch with economic duress runs contrary to and considerably dilutes the criteria for establishing duress.

if the legislature intended to the check arbitrations in case of serious fraud, the amendment should have been brought to Section 8 and 11

If India aims to be an “arbitration hub” then it is imperative that India acknowledging Third Party Funding as a viable commercial practice.

The multi-tiered dispute-resolution clauses (“MTDC”) provide sequential dispute resolution procedures which conclude with arbitration.

allowing arbitration to resolve competition law disputes with some safeguards, would be a progressive step in the right direction

A contract or part of it is deemed to be unconscionable if it exempts any party thereto from liability for wilful breach of the contract.

PDF version of the Article - Shiv Sang Thakur[1] 1. Introduction The Central Government passed The Arbitration and Conciliation...

The pursuit of justice is not to be lost in modernising law and order. Thus, AI instruments require themselves to be extremely accurate.

the Court modified the award in favour of the claimant and granted interest pendente lite together with principal amount.

The grant of refund along with eighteen percent rate of interest in addition to the damages by the arbitral tribunal was perverse.

Nothing can replace human virtue which is the most fundamental requirement for justice.

- Purbasha Panda* Part I of this Article dealing with the Judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal can be accessed here. part two deals...

The decision of the Delhi High Court in this case undermines the ability of the parties to tailor the arbitration according to their needs.

What is the appropriate standard of review with respect to stay on winding up application, when the same is subject to an arbitration clause

parties must make sure to use the term ‘seat’/’juridical place’, as it almost leaves no room for differing interpretations.

In contract of reciprocal promises where one party prevents the other from performing the contract, such contract becomes voidable.

[T]he authors conclusively put that Arbitrator should not have deviated from the standard formulas for computation of damages.

A detailed examination on considering the evidence is not warranted in an application for setting aside awards.

The interpretation given by the Courts has cautioned the arbitrators to solely deduce their reasoning based on plain evidences.

by consolidating all the previous definitions of public policy and the applicability of same in varied instances, the judgment has already m

- Purbasha Panda[1] Staff Writer, The Arbitration Workshop A. INTRODUCTION Party autonomy is the plinth on which the entire edifice of...

The third and final in this series, this article will examine whether online arbitral awards or e-awards are enforceable.

This article discusses the judgment of the Supreme Court in Quippo v. Janardan on waiver of right to object in arbitration proceedings.

- ADVAIT GHOSH[1] I. INTRODUCTION This article will attempt to elucidate the bars to seeking interim relief through the prism of The...

In order to develop an effective set of arbitral rules, the NDIAC would be well-served in recognising the requirements of the market.

Clearly, the judgment in Mankastu Impex muddies the waters. The three co-equal Bench judgments will beleaguer Courts across the country.

What we must remember is: “What counts is the choice of law, not the fact that the procedure may be conducted partially or totally online.”